← Basil BriefBETA ArticlesSources

What is the MICRA cap on noneconomic damages in California?

California · updated 2026-08-31 · 637 words · 3 authorities cited

The Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA) places caps on noneconomic damages in California medical malpractice cases. These caps vary depending on the type of action (personal injury or wrongful death) and are subject to annual increases and inflation adjustments.

The rule

In actions against health care providers or institutions for professional negligence, civil liability for noneconomic losses is capped 7. For personal injury actions, the cap is five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) against one or more health care providers collectively, and five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) against one or more health care institutions collectively 7. For wrongful death actions, the cap is five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) against one or more health care providers collectively, and five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) against one or more health care institutions collectively 7. These amounts apply regardless of the number of defendant health care providers or institutions or the number of separate causes of action 4.

The applicable dollar amounts for personal injury claims increase by forty thousand dollars ($40,000) each January 1st for 10 years, up to seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000) 4. The applicable dollar amounts for wrongful death claims increase by fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) each January 1st for 10 years, up to one million dollars ($1,000,000) 4. These increases began on January 1, 2023, and the dollar amount in effect at the time of judgment, arbitration award, or settlement applies 4. Beginning January 1, 2034, the maximum amounts of $750,000 for personal injury and $1,000,000 for wrongful death will be adjusted for inflation by 2 percent annually 4. In no action shall the amount of damages for noneconomic losses exceed these applicable dollar amounts 4.

How it applies

The MICRA cap specifically limits noneconomic damages in cases involving professional negligence by health care providers or institutions 7. Noneconomic damages include items such as physical pain, mental suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, disfigurement, physical impairment, inconvenience, grief, anxiety, humiliation, and emotional distress 6. There is no fixed standard for deciding the amount of these noneconomic damages; instead, jurors must use their judgment to determine a reasonable amount based on the evidence and common sense 6.

The cap applies collectively to all health care providers and separately to all health care institutions involved in a claim 7. This means that if multiple health care providers are defendants, their combined liability for noneconomic losses cannot exceed the specified cap 7. The same principle applies to multiple health care institutions 7. A health care provider or institution defendant cannot be liable for noneconomic losses in more than one of the specified categories, regardless of how the categories are applied or combined 7. The cap also extends to unaffiliated health care providers or institutions responsible for noneconomic losses based on separate and independent acts of professional negligence 7.

The specific dollar amount of the cap that applies to a case is the amount in effect at the time of judgment, arbitration award, or settlement 4. This means that the cap can increase over time due to the annual adjustments 4.

What this does not cover

This information specifically addresses the MICRA cap on noneconomic damages in cases of professional negligence by health care providers and institutions 7. It does not cover caps on economic damages, which are distinct from noneconomic damages and include items like lost earnings, lost profits, and medical expenses [1, 2, 3, 5, 8]. The sources do not provide information on how MICRA might apply to other types of personal injury claims not involving professional negligence by health care entities, such as dog bite cases 2 or abduction cases [3, 5]. Furthermore, the sources do not detail the specific definitions of "health care provider" or "health care institution" beyond stating that they are persons or entities licensed or certified under various codes 4.

Authorities cited

1. CACI VF-409

Cited in this article. Open Basil Brief to read the passage in full.

2. CIV 3333.2

Cited in this article. Open Basil Brief to read the passage in full.

3. CACI 3905A

Cited in this article. Open Basil Brief to read the passage in full.

Check this before you rely on it. Basil Brief has no citator, so it cannot tell you whether an authority has since been limited or overruled. It answers only from the California sources listed on the sources page, as they stood on 2026-08-31. Read the authority yourself before you cite it.

Ask a follow-up

This page is one answer. Put your own facts to the same corpus and get the passages back with it.

Ask Basil Brief